Social spiders
نویسنده
چکیده
References 1. Buss, L.W. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press). 2. Bonner, J.T. (1967). The Cellular Slime Molds, Second Edition (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press). 3. Buss, L.W. (1982). Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 5337–5341. 4. Kessin, R.H. (2001). Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press). 5. Strassmann, J.E., Zhu, Y., and Queller, D.C. (2000). Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 408, 965–967. 6. Maynard Smith, J., and Szathmary, E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution (San Francisco, CA: Freeman). 7. Frank, S.A. (1996). Models of parasite virulence. Q. Rev. Biol. 71, 37–78. 8. Holland, J.J. (1990). Defective viral genomes. In Virology, B.N. Fields, ed. (New York: Raven Press), pp. 151–165. 9. Levin, B.R., and Lenski, R.E. (1983). Coevolution in bacteria and their viruses and plasmids. In Coevolution, D.J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin, eds. (Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates), pp. 99–127. 10. Frank, S.A. (2003). Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution 57, 693–705. 11. Leigh, E.G. (1977). How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 4542–4546. 12. Burt, A., and Trivers, R. (2006). Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Elements (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press). 13. Frank, S.A. (1996). Host-symbiont conflict over the mixing of symbiotic lineages. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 339–344. 14. Moran, N.A. (2006). Symbiosis. Curr. Biol. 16, R866–R871. 15. Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16. 16. Frank, S.A. (1998). Foundations of Social Evolution (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press). 17. West, S.A., Griffin, A.S., Gardner, A., and Diggle, S.P. (2006). Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 597–607. 18. Griffin, A.S., West, S.A., and Buckling, A. (2004). Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430, 1024–1027. 19. Martin, R.D., and Harvey, P.H. (1985). Brain size allometry: ontogeny and phylogeny. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, W Jungers, ed. (New York: Plenum), pp. 147–173. 20. Humphrey, N. (1976). The social function of the intellect. In: Growing Points in Ethology, P.P.G. Bateson and R.A. Hinde, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 303–317. 21. Alexander, R.D. (1979). Darwinism and Human Affairs (University of Washington Press.) 22. Lachmann, M., Szamado, S., and Bergstrom, C.T. (2001) Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13189–13194.
منابع مشابه
Societies of Spiders Compared to Th E Societies of Insects'
Since the earliest studies of social behavior in spiders, their social structure has often bee n compared with that of social insects . A preliminary conclusion was that the degree of evolution o f spider societies was significantly lower than that found in insects . However, we wonder if the problem has been correctly posed . In light of Wilson's and Michener's works, enriched by those of the ...
متن کاملHabitat productivity predicts the global distribution of social spiders
Permanently-social spiders share a common suite of traits, including cooperative foraging and brood care, elimination of pre-mating dispersal, and the transition to an inbreeding mating system. Social spiders are confined to tropic and subtropical habitats, suggesting environmental constraints on the evolution of group living in spiders. Because, social spider groups are sedentary and dependent...
متن کاملThe age and evolution of sociality in Stegodyphus spiders: a molecular phylogenetic perspective.
Social, cooperative breeding behaviour is rare in spiders and generally characterized by inbreeding, skewed sex ratios and high rates of colony turnover, processes that when combined may reduce genetic variation and lower individual fitness quickly. On these grounds, social spider species have been suggested to be unstable in evolutionary time, and hence sociality a rare phenomenon in spiders. ...
متن کاملCausal webs in epidemiology
The notion of ̳causal web‘ emerged in the epidemiological literature in the early Sixties and had to wait until the Nineties for a thorough critical appraisal. Famously, Nancy Krieger argued that such a notion isn‘t helpful unless we specify what kind of spiders create the webs. This means, according to Krieger, (i) that the role of the spiders is to provide an explanation of the yarns of the w...
متن کاملCooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies.
A decrease in the surface area per unit volume is a well known constraint setting limits to the size of organisms at both the cellular and whole-organismal levels. Similar constraints may apply to social groups as they grow in size. The communal three-dimensional webs that social spiders build function ecologically as single units that intercept prey through their surface and should thus be sub...
متن کاملRe-description of Xysticus bimaculatus L. Koch, 1867 (Araneae, Thomisidae) and characterization of its subsocial lifestyle
Spiders have become an important model to study the evolution of sociality, but a lack of their detailed natural history and taxonomy hinders broader comparative studies. Group-living crab spiders (Thomisidae) provide an excellent contrast to other social spiders since they lack a communal capture web, which was thought to be a critical factor in the evolution of sociality. Only three non-webbu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Current Biology
دوره 17 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007